GRE，全稱Graduate Record Examination，中文名稱為美國(guó)研究生入學(xué)考試，適用于除法律與商業(yè)外的各專業(yè)。由美國(guó)教育考試服務(wù)處(Educational Testing Service，簡(jiǎn)稱ETS)主辦，GRE是美國(guó)、加拿大的大學(xué)各類研究生院（除管理類學(xué)院，法學(xué)院）要求申請(qǐng)者所必須具備的一個(gè)考試成績(jī)，也是教授對(duì)申請(qǐng)者是否授予獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金所依據(jù)的最重要的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 另有，Generic Routing Encapsulation（通用路由封裝）也簡(jiǎn)稱GRE。
有關(guān)張雷東老師argument提綱的疑惑
158.(衛(wèi)生健康，社會(huì)/論斷/——)The Trash-Site Safety Council has recently conducted a statewidestudy(5) of possible harmful effects of garbage sites on the health of peopleliving near the sites. A total of five sites and 300 people(1) were examined.The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation betweenthe proximity of homes to garbage sites and the incidence of unexplainedrashes(2) among people living in these homes. Furthermore, although it is truethat people living near the largest trash sites had a slightly higher incidenceof the rashes, there was otherwise nocorrelation between the size of the garbage sites and people's health(4). Therefore,the council is pleased to announce that the current system of garbage sitesdoes not pose a significant health hazard(3). We see no need to restrict thesize of such sites in our state or to place any restrictions(6) on the numberof homes built near the sites.
★★★
1、For lack of data concerning the total amount of garbage sites and people living near them in the state, the reliability of the study is open to doubt. (quantity of the sample) ★★★
2、The argument treats a lack of proof that current system of garbage sites will pose some extent of health hazard as constituting sufficient proof that it will not pose any significant health hazard. (do the statistics make any difference?) ★★★★★
3、以下省略
第二點(diǎn)的as應(yīng)該是“當(dāng)”的意思把?我的理解為：當(dāng)提出足夠論據(jù)證明垃圾不會(huì)有危害時(shí)，卻沒(méi)有證明垃圾存在一定的危害。
好奇怪，垃圾堆和危害的關(guān)系按常理就可以聯(lián)系起來(lái)，題干中就是做這么一個(gè)survey(雖然survey得過(guò)程有很多令人懷疑的東西)來(lái)確定是否兩者有關(guān)聯(lián)，當(dāng)然不用事先聲明垃圾和危害有關(guān)聯(lián)...
感謝您閱讀《argument158提綱 》一文，出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
有關(guān)張雷東老師argument提綱的疑惑
158.(衛(wèi)生健康，社會(huì)/論斷/——)The Trash-Site Safety Council has recently conducted a statewidestudy(5) of possible harmful effects of garbage sites on the health of peopleliving near the sites. A total of five sites and 300 people(1) were examined.The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation betweenthe proximity of homes to garbage sites and the incidence of unexplainedrashes(2) among people living in these homes. Furthermore, although it is truethat people living near the largest trash sites had a slightly higher incidenceof the rashes, there was otherwise nocorrelation between the size of the garbage sites and people's health(4). Therefore,the council is pleased to announce that the current system of garbage sitesdoes not pose a significant health hazard(3). We see no need to restrict thesize of such sites in our state or to place any restrictions(6) on the numberof homes built near the sites.
★★★
1、For lack of data concerning the total amount of garbage sites and people living near them in the state, the reliability of the study is open to doubt. (quantity of the sample) ★★★
2、The argument treats a lack of proof that current system of garbage sites will pose some extent of health hazard as constituting sufficient proof that it will not pose any significant health hazard. (do the statistics make any difference?) ★★★★★
3、以下省略
第二點(diǎn)的as應(yīng)該是“當(dāng)”的意思把?我的理解為：當(dāng)提出足夠論據(jù)證明垃圾不會(huì)有危害時(shí)，卻沒(méi)有證明垃圾存在一定的危害。
好奇怪，垃圾堆和危害的關(guān)系按常理就可以聯(lián)系起來(lái)，題干中就是做這么一個(gè)survey(雖然survey得過(guò)程有很多令人懷疑的東西)來(lái)確定是否兩者有關(guān)聯(lián)，當(dāng)然不用事先聲明垃圾和危害有關(guān)聯(lián)...
感謝您閱讀《argument158提綱 》一文，出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。