法律名稱英譯若干問題（六）

3.應(yīng)用復(fù)數(shù)而誤用單數(shù)，如下例“Provision”系“Provisions”之誤：
    Provision governing the（sic）Laying of Submarine Cables and Pipelines
    -Laws and Regulations of the People's Republic of China Governing Foreign-Related Matters
    （1949-1990）, Vol.III, p.12
    4.重要詞語誤譯，如：
    原文：上海外高橋保稅區(qū)管理辦法
    原譯：Procedures of Shanghai Municipality for the Administration of the Shanghai Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone
    -Shanghai Foreign Economic Rules and Regulations（1982-1990）, Shanghai people's Publishing House 1991, p. 563
    應(yīng)譯：Measures of Shanghai Municipality for the Administration of the Shanghai Waigaoqiao Bonded Area
    按：原譯“Free Trade Zone”明明是“自由貿(mào)易區(qū)”而根本不是什么“保稅區(qū)”：“保稅區(qū)”明明不是什么“Free Trade Zone”而是“Bonded Area”，此乃常識的常識，譯者有所不知！如此亂翻誤譯，其職業(yè)道德何在？耐人尋味！
    5. 譯文漏字以致文理不通，如下列“Implementation”與“Foreign”之間漏了一個“of”
    Rules for the Implementation Foreign Exchange Control Relating to Individuals
    -Laws and Regulations of the People's Republic of China Governing Foreign-Related Matters, Vol. 2, p.9
    法律名稱英譯還存在這樣或那樣的問題，其根源有二：譯者的知識結(jié)構(gòu)尚欠合理，心態(tài)有待調(diào)整，幸勿等閑！